Trust

AI Use

The platform includes an optional AI practice coach. This page explains what it does, what it does not do, and who stays in control. Sections marked in review are not yet published commitments.

Last updated: August 2026

This page is maintained by Progressive Literacy Model to answer common questions about how the platform works. It describes current product behavior. It is not an independent audit, a certification, or legal advice.

3 sections on this page are still in review. Those sections show what has to be verified before anything is published as policy. Nothing marked in review should be relied on as a commitment.

What the AI reviews

When a reader submits a read-aloud recording for AI practice feedback, the AI reviews that recording and the assigned passage. It looks at the same reading behaviors a teacher observes.

What observations the AI may generate

A practice score for each reading behavior.
A short comment naming what it heard.
One suggested next step to try on the next reading.

What the AI does not determine

It does not assign grades, placement, or intervention decisions.
It does not diagnose a reading disability or any other condition.
It does not replace a teacher's professional judgment or a formal assessment.
It does not evaluate a student's intelligence, effort, or behavior beyond the reading itself.

Educator override

An educator can review any AI-generated score or comment and replace it. Teacher review is the record of record: when a teacher scores a recording, the teacher's scores and notes are what appear on the scorecard and growth history.

Turning AI feedback off

AI practice feedback is optional. A teacher chooses per assignment whether feedback is generated by AI or held for manual teacher review, and a teacher or district account determines whether students can see AI feedback at all or only teacher feedback.

Reporting inaccurate output

If an AI observation looks wrong, use the contact form and include the assignment and the date. Teachers should override the score in the review screen so the student's record reflects the teacher's judgment.

Whether student data trains outside models

Pending review — not yet a published policy statement

This section is intentionally unanswered. It will be completed once the following have been confirmed by the business owner or legal reviewer:

Written confirmation from each AI vendor on training use of submitted audio and text.
Whether a no-training commitment can be stated contractually, and in what wording.
Whether recordings or only transcripts are sent to the AI vendor.

Which AI vendors and models are used

Pending review — not yet a published policy statement

This section is intentionally unanswered. It will be completed once the following have been confirmed by the business owner or legal reviewer:

The vendors and model families the business is willing to name publicly.
Processing region for AI requests.
How model changes are communicated to schools.

AI accuracy, bias, and human review commitments

Pending review — not yet a published policy statement

This section is intentionally unanswered. It will be completed once the following have been confirmed by the business owner or legal reviewer:

Any accuracy statement the business is prepared to support with evidence.
Approved wording on dialect, accent, and language variation in speech review.
Whether a human review step is guaranteed for any high-stakes use.

Questions, or a privacy request? Contact us.